Gov 2.0? What to Do About Aaron Swartz & the Officials You Don’t Get to Vote On


I never met Aaron nor do I use Reddit. Once in a while I ran into JSTOR online – the database he is accused of hacking – and I do appreciate his involvement in RSS. In other words, I am an indirect beneficiary of the people like him who shaped the Internet. I am part of the Internet “crowd.”

To us, this story matters – but much more profoundly than your average politician understands. I say this because politicians want to amend the law they used to go after him – a felony with a 35 year sentence for a relatively harmless computer crime. That’s a good start but not what this is about.

English: Aaron Swartz at a Creative Commons event.

English: Aaron Swartz at a Creative Commons event. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Aaron ran afoul of the one group where the crowd couldn’t matter less – political appointees. The US Attorney General had every legal right in the world to go after him. There are always more pressing issues but if you want to make a name in a tech town like Boston you go after a highly visible tech crime. They had a specific law on their side but with their unchecked discretion they can always find some law and unless you a rich and powerful you’re in trouble.

Homeland Security might call this asymmetrical warfare. The Feds have unlimited resources and you have your piggy bank.

This is the gray area of politics where the real work is done. The feedback loop of the Internet has yet to penetrate this world. Both Democrats and Republicans use this and it is really part of the PermaGov – a combination of unreachable Civil Servants and government appointees that do the real work of government outside the easy reach of the voting public.

This is why bankers responsible for the housing crash never wind up in jail. Yet, I sat in a jury where 4 Federal agents and a prominent Federal judge put a street corner hustler away for conning $18,000 out of the mortgage system. The bank that made millions selling its junk to Lehman actually got to testify against him. This is why Henry Paulson earmarked $60+ billion of TARP money to AIG just so it could pay its debt obligation to his alma mater, Goldman Sachs.

You didn’t get to vote on any of that.

So the real issue is, when will the “crowd” get to penetrate those sacred enclaves of government?

This is part of a Social Contract drawn up before there was mass media, let alone the Internet. Smart politicians who know how to work this system know this is where democracy can be sidestepped. It is part of what allowed politicians like Nancy Pelosi to make a fortune through legalized insider trading.

So, if Aaron is to count and you are willing to confront real power, this is where it starts. You petition every government agency to be exposed, open to public review and approval.

Think of what happened when the Journal News published the names and addresses of every gun owner in the lower Hudson Valley. Now imagine what would happen if the public got to vote on the prosecutorial discretion of the DOJ?  Or that the function and decisions along with the salary and performance of government officials were part of the public feedback loop?

That would just be the beginning and it would make Occupy Wall Street look like a picnic. It would also be a fitting response to the sad demise of this pioneer.

If Aaron Swartz is a martyr – it is to Government 2.0.

Ed.: Upon his death, Swartz’s family issued the following statement: “Aaron’s death is not simply a personal tragedy. It is the product of a criminal justice system rife with intimidation and prosecutorial overreach. Decisions made by officials in the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney’s office and at MIT contributed to his death. The US Attorney’s office pursued an exceptionally harsh array of charges, to punish an alleged crime that had no victims.”

Aaron had two strikes against him: he was an advocate of open democracy (demandprogress) and he was facing a federal prosecutor working under a US Attorney with her eye on the governor’s mansion. There is a petition being circulated to Remove United States District Attorney Carmen Ortiz from office for overreach in the case of Aaron Swartz. Punishment should fit the crime, and citizens of the United States should not be terrorized by the very people whom we’ve empowered to protect our rights and freedoms. Lest we forget: the only thing necessary for the perpetuation of evil is that good people do nothing. Sign the petition.

About the author: Alan Brody

Alan Brody is the founder of the iBreakfast.com and SAVVE – Silicon Alley Vision Venture for Executives – brainstorming events. As executive program director of TECHmarketing, he has a long history of creating firsts in high technology media events which now includes eTV World the Digital TV/Internet Conference and Hollyweb, a major conference event at both the Consumer Electronics Show and the National Association of Broadcasters.

You are seconds away from signing up for the hottest list in New York Tech!

Join the millions and keep up with the stories shaping entrepreneurship. Sign up today.