If “smart money” is money plus the promise of help that is worth paying for, then “dumb money” is money plus hidden harm, and “mostly money” is mostly money. All 3 provide what entrepreneurs primarily want from investors: money.
1. Avoid dumb money: you do not hire harmful people — so do not marry them for the life of the company either.
2. Most investors are mostly money but very few of them act like their primary contribution is capital. They spend too much time selling you on their value-add and not enough time getting you a quick yes or no.
3. Smart money is rare — after all, would you work with most investors if they did not bring a piggy bank? Also, too many investors think the “smart” in smart money means “we know how to run your business better than you.”
Weed out the dumb money with diligence.
Do not assume any investor won’t be harmful. Do the diligence to prove otherwise:
1. Do you trust them?
2. Will they provide their “pro rata” in the next round? (Not so important for seed funds and angels.)
3. Will they support you if the company is going sideways?
4. Do they have impeccable references?
5. Do they want control?
6. When it comes time to sell the company, will they let you?
7. Will they let you expand the option pool to hire someone great?
8. Do they want to replace you as CEO?
9. Will they try to merge you with a dying company from their portfolio?
10. Do you want to marry them for the life of the company?
11. Are they committed to investing in startups and do they have a reputation to protect in the startup world?
12. et cetera …
Evaluate supposedly smart money with the same smart money test.
After you have weeded out the dumb money, do the smart money test on everybody else:
Would you add the investor to your board of directors (or advisors) if they did not come with money?
If the answer is no, then they are mostly money (see below). If the answer is yes, subtract some dilution from their investment since their eliminating the cost of a value-add director or advisor. You are paying for the smart money investor — with his or her own money!
A smart money investor can be very valuable because they are good enough to be an advisor or board member and they own enough to really care about the company in good times and bad times. An advisor or independent director will not own enough of the company to really care if the company is in trouble — their career is nt on the line like an investor’s.
But! If the investor you thought was smart does not add value, you cannot fire them like an advisor or director and get your money back. You can only hope to ignore them. Which is why it is safer to …
Assume your investors are mostly money.
Whether you raise smart money or mostly money, you should raise money as if your investors were mostly money. In other words, unbundle money and value-add. Get money on the best terms possible and get value-add on the best terms possible.
You can buy advice and introductions for 1/10th of the price that most investors charge. An investor will buy 15-to-30 percent of your company. An advisor or independent director will require 0.25-to-2.5% of your company with a vesting schedule of 2-to-4 years.
An advisor or independent director will be handpicked from the population of planet Earth. They should be more effective than someone picked from the vast pool of investors who want to invest in your company.
They will own common stock, unlike an investor who owns preferred stock with additional rights.
And they will not have conflicting responsibilities to their venture firm, other venture firms, or limited partners.
Money-add first, value-add second.
Value-add is great but it comes after money-add. First, find a money-add investor who will make an investment decision quickly, who is humble and trustworthy, who will treat you like a peer, who shares your vision and is betting on you, not the market.
Image credit: CC by COD Newsroom