• Apply To Contribute To AlleyWatch
    • Write for AlleyWatch
  • Tell Us About Your Startup
  • Email Signup
  • Advertise on AlleyWatch
AlleyWatch
  • Business
  • Startups
  • Funding
  • Women in Tech
  • NYC Tech
No Result
View All Result
  • Business
  • Startups
  • Funding
  • Women in Tech
  • NYC Tech
No Result
View All Result
AlleyWatch
No Result
View All Result
Home Resources Advice

Dropping Like Its Dot: M Dot Sites to Lose 50 Percent Share in 2015

alleywatchstaff by alleywatchstaff
Dropping Like Its Dot: M Dot Sites to Lose 50 Percent Share in 2015
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

6685453991_4663fa95b4_z

M-dot sites aren’t dead, just dying.

A recent report released by Pure Oxygen Labs surveyed the Internet Retailer 500 Guide (2014) and found use of m-dot sites for ecommerce dropped from 79 percent in 2013 to 59 percent, with dynamic serving and responsive sites increasing 12 percent and 15 percent, respectively, with share shifting away from first-generation mobile solutions even further this year.

Dynamic serving is currently used more often than responsive among m-commerce sites, expected to pass 20 percent in 2015. Though responsive has several advantages, retailers are opting for dynamic serving to avoid responsive’s performance drag (a major factor in bounce, conversion rate and customer satisfaction).

Responsive vs. Dynamic 

The main difference between responsive and dynamic (also known as adaptive) is adaptive allows you to target device-specific HTML, rather than load a single HTML file that uses CSS and media queries to format the experience.

Aside from being faster, the advantages of adaptive are:

You don’t need a complete website overhaul

Responsive projects typically require a redesign from the ground up, and thorough testing across devices to ensure breakpoints don’t become break points. Rather than using CSS and media queries, the adaptive approach uses device-specific HTML that’s pulled by the device (client) or detected by the server.

It’s likely better than SEO

A website can keep to one-URL (vs. anm.site copy) for each page with either responsive or adaptive, but a faster page load speed is likely an edge over responsive to search engines, who do use page load speed and bounce rates back to search pages as ranking factors.

There are always exceptions. A responsive site can be optimized for performance, and an adaptive site can load slowly due to page weight, number of HTML options to load or server/technical issues.

If you do use adaptive, make sure you follow Google’s tips for getting your mobile version crawled and indexed, and to appear as a mobile friendly site in search.

You can design contextual experiences

While responsive design offers some ability to show and hide content to different screen sizes, laser-targeting to specific devices isn’t possible.

You may want to show different content to Apple users vs. Android. For example, iOS8 has a horrid Price-is-Right feel to its menu selection. With adaptive, you could override the native selection tools for such devices to a custom method of input. If future OS versions correct the usability issue, you can still target that version to remaining iOS8 users.


 

Reprinted by permission.

Image Credit: CC by Marta Sánchez

Previous Post

An Angel in New York: Andrew Ackerman

Next Post

Crossfit and Startups Are The Same Thing

Next Post
Crossfit and Startups Are The Same Thing

Crossfit and Startups Are The Same Thing

ABOUT ALLEYWATCH

ABOUT US
ADVERTISE
EDITORIAL GUIDELINES
LEGAL
PRIVACY
TERMS OF USE

CONTACT

CONTACT US
ADVERTISE
TIPS
WRITE FOR US

CHANNELS

NYC VC
NYC TECH EVENTS
NYC TECH NEWS
NYC STARTUPS
NYC COWORKING
TECH DIRECTORY

© 2023 AlleyWatch | All Rights Reserved | Proudly Made for NYC

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Startups
  • Funding
  • AlleyTalk

© 2023 AlleyWatch | All Rights Reserved | Proudly Made for NYC

You are seconds away from signing up for the hottest list in New York Tech!

Join the millions and keep up with the stories shaping entrepreneurship. Sign up today.

Close this popup